Related topics

Slow internet connection
Rayxen poiter...@REMOVEhotmail.com alt os linux mandrake alt os windows-xp I've got a dual boot with XP and Mandrake 8.1, unfortunately I don't have BOOT TIME: Microsoft has come a long way from extremely slow boot times with XP, this is by far the fastest GUI-Based OS I've ran, less than 12 seconds cold boot!

My experiences with the 760CD
Networking was just perfect between the 3 machines with Win2K Pro on box A. Now, with XP Pro on box A, networking from A is extremely slow. It's from the XP machine where it's slow. In order to test my NIC and network infrastructure, I decided to setup my XP box (A) to dual boot with XP Pro and Win2K Pro.

Help - Extremely slow file copies between Win2k and Win98SE
Christian Cabal cca...@yahoo.com comp os linux misc I dual boot win95 and Linux (RH6.0). I recently installed both mame32 for win95 and x-mame, for Linux. For some strange reason x-mame runs extremely slow. In win95, mame32 runs pretty decently though. I have a Cyrix233. Any ideas what could be causing the slowdown

slow boot with xp pro
(I don't - I dual boot back to DOS). OS/2 resets the floppy controller periodically -- which DOS backup programs don't expect. ...Also, if you are using a DOS Even though it works by using central point backup, the data rate is extremely slow -- about 300k/min, comparing to 4MB/min for norton backup under dos.

x-mame runs really slow
A dual-boot of Windows 2000 and Windows XP should be done through a third-party boot manager such as Boot Magic, that comes with Partition Magic. Hi, Is there a problem running office xp pro on a win2k box ? i've noticed outlook is extremely slow.... Are they're any issues with dual booting xp pro with win2k

DOS problems in XP
I have not been able to use my burner or network, or send an email for 6 months, due to corrupt data or extremely slow speed.. it takes 2 hours to send a 40k a 2 x with justlink... no matter What MS operating system I use IAmME wrote: My 1.4GHz is running smoooooooooth at 1450 (10x145) Dual Boot Win98/Win2k.

CHRP or PPCP Compliant BE
They are extremely slow, especially on directories with lots of files. Yep. This is supposed to be sped up a lot in the next release. .... 9)Dual boot is very nice, but the OS/2 side of it should have a graphical front end. It looks amateurish running in a box, kind of like those TTY boxes you get sometimes on

Explorer extremely slow displaying contents of my computer...
My desktop was dual-boot, and it worked fine under Windows. I then bought an 802.11B wireless card that attaches via USB slot. Not supported. That one got a signal and kinda worked, but was EXTREMELY slow due to poor reception. To avoid the whole mess, I picked up a wireless media adapter.

New to Group..Would like advice..
I just installed Vista Ultimate 32 Bit this weekend and Network Transfers (GBit Ethernet) from the server to the client are extremely slow. But if I reboot my machine in xp (its dual boot) and do the same i get my usual 50meg per sec. I've tried searching the net for the past 7 days but I have not found any

mapped network drive in windows explorer EXTREMELY slow
That's what I did.....although I rarely boot into Win98 anymore unless I want to do some "playing". Greg "Bill Crocker" <bcroc...@home.com> wrote in message Later, I tried it on a Dual-PIII-600MHz, with 512MB of RAM. When I install a virtual machine to support Win98SE, it runs extremely slow.

Windows XP - Boon or Bane?
I dual boot this machine to Windows for Workgroups. The GUI performance in Windows is quite good - no complaints. The Linux install uses X, Enlightenment and It was also extremely slow to startup when I tried it with a X environment with KDE. I no longer use it with a GUI. However, I think if you switch from

VM Etremely Slow (was "Dual boot HD problems")
Computer A is Win98SE, B is Win98SE and C is dual boot Win98SE/Win2k. Copying large files (I'm using a 50meg file for testing) between any of the three computers This sort of problem has been mentioned before, with variations: W2K implicated or not, transfer rate slow in the direction Ato B but 'normal rate'

Anybody using W2k pro with NetWare servers ?
... uk comp os win2000 We had similar performance in our Windows NT/Novell Netware environment, but it was browsing NT resources that was extremely slow. Now, I am in academia so it is quite a fast network, and the same machine in it's other incarnation (Win 98 dual boot) (don't ask...support requirements) is

Wine 20030115, Mandrake 9.1 - Hangs on WinApps install and run
I just installed XP in a dual boot configuration with Win2000. I have always used Winproxy to control access to the internet for my kids two computers, with no problems. For some reason, the same installation and configuration on XP is resulting in extremely slow connection speeds for the client computers and

Solution for slow W98se to w2000 Intranet File transfer speeds
I'm running dual boot system with Caldera Workstation 3.1, Windows2000 Professional and Wine 20011106. Any ideas or success stories? Here some output lines: wine --winver win2k "MTSC.exe" fixme:imm:ImmAssociateContext (0x00010025, 0x00000000): stub err:shell:SHGetSpecialFolderPathA folder unknown or not allowed

Linux? I'm tired of being the oddball in the group. It's not ...
Unfortunately, this sometimes happens, especially on Dual Boot systems and/or if the system is shut down improperly (eg, just powered off) because of OS/2's disk My biggest complaint at this point is that the system is rather slow. It is extremely slow compared to Windows. I'm hoping that I can alter the

Still no solution after 5 months(!) - Transfer speed problems
Our 166MHz Pentiums with 32Mb of RAM with a dual boot NT+ R13/DOS+R12 ran R13 FASTER THAN DOS. Yes, that's right. I didn't believe it either. It is extremely slow indeed. It's the same version - but you need to load the Win32s subsystem. Windows NT is the best platform, Win 95 if you must.

Help - Extremely slow file copies between Win2k and Win98SE
Look at some of the newer PCI cards with Aureal chipsets. b) LS120's are extremely slow and aren't used that much. If you want to exchange files with other You would be better off buying and learning to use NT4 or Linux, with maybe a dual boot to DOS/Win95 for legacy games. Only problem is that much of the

HELP!! 16-bit apps won't run in separate memory space
The only machine that I've got that I dual boot is my laptop, and that's only because it won't play Age of Empires under VMWare... 'course, it is only a P133... and install a pristine Any system that's been running for 10 years without any changes, updates or upgrades is going to appear to be extremely slow.

Tiny starter configuration for FreeBSD
Computer A is Win98SE, B is Win98SE and C is dual boot Win98SE/Win2k. Copying large files (I'm using a 50meg file for testing) between any of the three computers takes rougly 30 sec. [Not stellar, but reasonable]. When I copy the same file between either A or B and C booted to Win2k, it takes on the order of 7-8